The Outsider

Remember Brando in 'Last Tango in Paris' he runs in, looking at his mother's coffin, and calls her all the names under the sun. He raves and shouts and screams, he conveys in that moment his true feelings. What he really feels. But that is not the expected reaction. The expected reaction is one of sorrow, grief, pity, remorse, and undying love for one's own mother - even if that's not what he really feels. The question for society then - who do we trust? The man who lies, or the one who wants to convey his truest of feelings in that moment. Is 'playing the game' - doing what is expected or following the normal convention of society the right way to go? This book explores that phenomenon in astounding detail. The imagery and the scenic descriptions are as vivid as it gets. But there's a much bigger picture..... The wild boy of Ayeron, Kasper Hauser, Raymond Babbit, and Meursault, are all autistically minded individuals who all share common traits: they are socially inept, egocentric, empathyless, independent thinkers who 'won't (or can't) play the game', who live inside their own minds - but crucially as pointed out in this book - way outside the neurotypical(NT) more common societal sphere. Meaning, that anyone of that other, way less common, brain wiring is seen as detached, cold, odd, strange, out of sync, weird, stange - 'The Outsider' The discussion of this aspect of the character, is whether he can play the game - if he wanted, but doesn't. Or, crucially, if he IS autistic, he doesn't know HOW to. But this book was written in 1942 (with a later afterword of 1955). Such a predisposed condition and design fault - not of the character's making, were not discussed in those days. Asperger Syndrome did not exist then. It does now. And other reviewers have also identified that fact. Utilitarian societies are based on the majority - with inclusion of minorities. But this is theory, the reality is very different (it's true because hate crime legislation exists for it) What is more commonly known becomes accepted as 'normal'. So the character in this book, by today's thinking, is either, not normal or autistic. But either way, he is still the terminal 'outsider'. But who then, knowing this 'difference' has got the guts to stand out from the crowd. Who cares if he's an outsider or not. This book also discusses that type of character. Then we can add the time at which the book is written. All art and literature is indicative of what is happening in the world at the time. And in Europe the post war era of the individual with is own utter free thinking, who chooses everything in his own life, regardless of the convention, stands out from the crowd. The people of the time (during the war years - they had no freedom, no choices and no vision), needed something, some kind of inspiration. Brando was the acting outsider, but he didn't arrive until 1951. It's also necessary to dicuss news values. That which is not supposed to happen gets talked about. Bad news is the news. So there's another reason why this book exists. 'The Outsider' exists, therefore he gets talked about - his unwillingness to 'play the game' or in this instance, to tell the court what it wants to hear. An obssession with 'truth seeking' - another classic autistic trait. You have to 'fake' it to make it - that's the common denomenator in society - the hard, cold truth, gritty realism, is what we keep away from. Those who live closer to it - they are the 'The Outsiders' - just like Bukowski in 'Ham on Rye'. But all the autistic geniuses Einstein, Wittgenstien, Newton, et al. are known for astute logical, scientific and non-emotional based ground breaking ideas - that changed the world, evolved thinking, and proved something previously unidentified. But they were loners, socially inept, difficult characters, who didn't like people. In societal terms, they too were, 'outsiders'. But this character in this book is a killer. Did he mean it? Albert Camus is the literary equivalent. The one who has the guts to step out side the circle of convention. This book, (very tautologically correct - words are precious and shouldn't be wasted. Why use ten words, when you can use three) is essential reading then - based on what exactly? everything mentioned above. And more. Who is god anyway? why are people petrified of death? why do they need 'another life' to cling to. The characater in this book is a staunch atheist. He won't play that game either. Rightly so? The book also discusses the differences between a motivist (intention) and the consequentialist (result, regardless of intention) in thought provoking detail. Did he really mean to shoot the Arab, or was it a spur of the moment thing. Manslaughter or first degree murder? The book also, like Larkin years later with Aubade, discusses all the 'emotions' ones goes through when thinking about death, and all the proclivities and 'feelings' associated with it. But this comes at the end. Just like death it self. Society loves a bad guy. Iconoclastic, separate, detached, unique. Who's got the guts to stand out from the crowd? The truth is what courts are for. Society, is not about truth, it's about characters. It's about convention, what is accepted as 'normal' and what is not. Anyone who dare step outside that circle becomes 'The Outsider'. I'd like to read a better novel that explores all these things. I doubt if one exists. This book then, is an Outside in itself. Sorry to ramble on, this review is too verbose, and no where near tautologically correct, if only I sounded like Fugazi or could write like Camus.

I approached this book with some trepidation as the word 'existential'gave me the impression that it would be a difficult book. What gave memore incendive to read it was that Robert Smith of the Cure had read it,and the Cure song 'Killing An Arab' is based on the book. It really isn't that difficult though. Haven't we all felt detatched fromthe world at times, and haven't we all sometimes felt like it's not worthbothering? Meursault (the protagonist) has an extreme case of thesefeelings to the point where he does not care about the death of others(his mother and the arab that he murdered), nor does he eventually careabout his own death. Even when he is offered a chance, even when the judgeat his murder trial is allowing him the choice of prison or death he doesnot decide one way or another; he simply remains detatched fromproceedings as he does not care. I think the reviewer who said that he though Camus was examining how aperson can be alienated from society is oversimplifying things too much.Camus is writing from a first person perspective, but I think it is more astudy of how society deals with the outsider. Meursault is a tool thatCamus uses to act out his own existentialist theories and put them in thecontext of a story about love, life and death. It is not an easy subjectto grasp fully as one would grasp the plot or characterisation from a moreconventional novel, as there are layers of complexity that require both adeep reading and a mind open to interpreting very simple truisms. As a novel it is intruiging but written a little too dispassionately forthe average reader (I can't see a Tom Clancy or Jackie Collins readergoing for this). There are also a few parts that don't translate well fromthe French, such as when Meursault notes that his neighbour has startedcalling him by his first name, which is more likely that his neighbour hasstarted using the familiar address of 'tu' rather than 'vous'. Camus has a great eye for detail, and almost makes the reader feel thatthey are in Algiers. None of us are well equiped to understand what drivesothers who don't conform to the norms of behaviour that we set as a rangeof reasonable behaviour, and this book gives us the chance to investigatenihilism from a first person viewpoint.

This book is a masterpiece of simplicity and profoundness. It makes you think...even after you read it. During your daily routines, your work, your casual gatherings, there will be occasions that The Outsider will appear in your thoughts and ask you 'You see, now?' I am really thinking whether I should give it a 4 or a 5 star. My ideal reating would be 4.5. Highly recommended for anyone who reflects a lot in and on his/her life. Also, would be a nice read for those people, who have a 'red' personality. I am not sure whether 'red' personalities will find it profound, but they will like it for its simplicity and brevity.

This is one of the best books I have read in years, it is simply written and and easy to read. It's a real gem, I hadn't even heard of it but the synopsis caught my eye and to my surprise it is one of my favourite books. Philosophically, it is an existential novel- The title character is Meursault, an alienated French man. Notified of his mother's death, Meursault attends her funeral, yet expresses none of the typical emotions expected in such circumstances. When he is later on trial for a spontaneous act of violence his apparent lack of remorse and emotion renders him guilty in the eyes of others. As an existentialist, he has no reason to regret what he does because it is done-- regret is redundant. Yet society cannot understand a man like this or his methods of thought. I cannot recommend this excellent work of literature highly enough- read it and cherish it.

Powerful, sometimes disturbing modern classic. Inexplicable murder on a beach in Algiers reveals a central character that appears to be a complete outsider but what is remarkable about this young man is that he wishes only to tell the truth. If you are unfamiliar with Camus' Existential novels then 'The Outsider' is a great place to start. Clear, fluid, economical writing style (in translation from the original French) makes for a powerful modern novel that will get you thinking.

*CONTAINS NO SPOILERS!* The Outsider is a small book but hugely fascinating. I'd heard good things about it and as I consider myself to be quite an outsider, I thought I'd enjoy reading about a fellow outsider (so to speak). There is a good plot and the characters are rather odd, which all adds to this fantastic story! I'd definitely recommend reading The Outsider, and if you don't enjoy it (which I doubt, if you're a fan of Camus!), then be grateful it's not the length of war and peace!

Brilliant and must read. A classic. Camus like most outstanding writer’s can make the reader reflect on human society in a truly thought-provoking manner. The main character in this book Mersault is crucified for doing something everyone should: being honest.

Got my order the other day, and arriving in good condition. Good 👍. Thanks.

Fantastic reading by one of the greatest thinkers. A fair price for the product as well. Though the design of the cover is a bit lacking in my opinion, a nice hard cover is recommended over a paper back.

I don't think I should review the book, the book being a Camus book, actually one of the best Camus's book, which is already critically acclaimed and reviewed by much more intellectual people. However, what I can review is the outside of the book. (And not the "The Outsider", the actual book- *bad* pun intended). #The paper quality is great. #The cover, in my opinion looks AMAZING. Excellent print quality as well. #Binding is good too, just break in the book properly. #Great translating by Joseph Laredo. And that's all for this review. Thank you.

This is a classic for all the right reasons. Camus gives the reader a scary vision of where non-conformity and nihilism can lead.

The Outsider is a brief, sharp novel about a man who refuses to perform the expected emotions society demands, and is judged more for that detachment than for his actions. The writing is plain and direct, which makes the whole thing feel colder and more confronting. As a physical edition, the dust cover is sadly poorly fitted, even though the design seems to closely mirror how the first edition print looked.

In the afterword of this The Outsider edition, Camus himself explains: “A long time ago, I summed up The Outsider in a sentence which I realize is extremely paradoxical - ‘In our society any man who doesn’t cry at his mother’s funeral is liable to be condemned to death.’ I simply meant that the hero of the book is condemned because he doesn’t play the game.” I liked the crispness of the slim novel - no wasted words, no lengthy descriptions, no laborious metaphors - just the protagonist honestly narrating his way through the story. Meursault seems an odd character because he is the way he is and speaks and acts the way he feels - he is honest. And since he’s also odd, his honesty makes him an outsider. He doesn’t mind. It’s a good read, simple, with a simple core - as aforementioned by Camus. The first half slowly draws you in - if too slow for you, stick with it, worth the time. The one thing, that doesn’t work for me is Meursault’s final wish (cries of hatred) - it jars with where he emotionally is and goes against his character - Meursault, odd as he is, is better than that.